View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:34 pm Post subject: SD Bans Abortion |
|
|
SD House Approves Abortion Ban Bill
Hmmm.. Looks like the abortion debate is going to get even uglier now.
Quote: |
Republican Gov. Mike Rounds said he was inclined to sign the bill, which would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless it was necessary to save the woman's life. The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest. |
Another reason not to live in South Dakota... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a state by state issue in the US?
Can the feds veto and/or Supreme court overturn it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well part of the reason the lawmakers of south dakota did it is they knew they'd get sued by Planned Parenthood and the like, saying the law is unconstitutional. This bad boy is going to be in the courts for years. The lawmakers are hoping it gets bumped up to the Supreme court eventually, where it'll be allowed to pass, and therefore eliminating Roe v. Wade. It is no coincidence whatsoever that the bill was passed soon after Alioto's confirmation. According to the article, some pro-life person has donated 1 million bucks for South Dakota to fight the lawsuit. A fund to pay for the legal fees is being arranged as well.
Fun times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Each state writes its own laws regulating the details of abortion. Through its decisions, the Supreme Court sets the guidelines. The Court can void a state (or federal) law that oversteps those guidelines.
Laws regulating capital punishment are handled the same. Some states, like Texas, have it; some states, like Iowa, do not. Those states with it must comply with Court guidelines.
I'm not a lawyer and certainly no expert on abortion law, so I don't know if abortion can be legal in one state and illegal in another state, like capital punishment is now. In my opinion, that would be the best solution to the issue. But as I say, I don't know if it is constitutionally possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest. |
I suppose it is one way of shoring up a declining birth rate
(there is no emoticon for digust) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinglejangle

Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Far far far away.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
canuckistan wrote: |
Quote: |
The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest. |
I suppose it is one way of shoring up a declining birth rate
(there is no emoticon for digust) |
I kind of doubt that rape and incest will make much of a difference to the birth rate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
bucheon bum wrote: |
Well part of the reason the lawmakers of south dakota did it is they knew they'd get sued by Planned Parenthood and the like, saying the law is unconstitutional. This bad boy is going to be in the courts for years. The lawmakers are hoping it gets bumped up to the Supreme court eventually, where it'll be allowed to pass, and therefore eliminating Roe v. Wade. It is no coincidence whatsoever that the bill was passed soon after Alioto's confirmation. According to the article, some pro-life person has donated 1 million bucks for South Dakota to fight the lawsuit. A fund to pay for the legal fees is being arranged as well.
Fun times. |
Hmmm, sounds familiar. Funny you didn't see my thread on this.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|