Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Sony Doesn't Like Black People
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Satori



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote:
Satori wrote:
Lyrt wrote:
Quote:
The message is recepted thusly: black is dull, white is hip.


You�re incorrect.


Hmmm, didn't see this pic in the OPs post. This complicates the issue abit. The pic in the OP, if it was the only image of the campaign, did look suspect. Now, I guess we have real disscussion on our hands...


There's no copy accompanying it. I think I read that it's on Sony's website, or part of a magazine spread. Regardless, the UK billboard was stand-alone.

AND it's still a terrible f*cking idea, using skin colors to symbolize a video game system.

Sparkles*_*

I agree. I'm unsure whether it's incredibly naive and un-thought-through marketing or active racism. Either way, marketing is a science these days, and the guys that do this stuff are paid well enough, they should not be f*ing up like this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiberious aka Sparkles



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Satori wrote:
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote:
Satori wrote:
Lyrt wrote:
Quote:
The message is recepted thusly: black is dull, white is hip.


You�re incorrect.


Hmmm, didn't see this pic in the OPs post. This complicates the issue abit. The pic in the OP, if it was the only image of the campaign, did look suspect. Now, I guess we have real disscussion on our hands...


There's no copy accompanying it. I think I read that it's on Sony's website, or part of a magazine spread. Regardless, the UK billboard was stand-alone.

AND it's still a terrible f*cking idea, using skin colors to symbolize a video game system.

Sparkles*_*

I agree. I'm unsure whether it's incredibly naive and un-thought-through marketing or active racism. Either way, marketing is a science these days, and the guys that do this stuff are paid well enough, they should not be f*ing up like this...


Agreed. And it's not the the first time Sony has been criticized recently for racist advertising.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=v0WvDT_D1Vs&search=psp%20squirrel

Sparkles*_*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cdninkorea wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
Man, first Cristal comes out 'n' disses their black consumers and now...


Hip-hop culture and black culture are not synonymous terms. For one, the demographic that buys more rap and hip-hop CDs than any other is rich white males between the ages of 18-24.

Second, there are lots of black people who don't fit under the hip-hop category. I doubt Cristal would mind if Bill Cosby, Colin Powell, Oprah, Thomas Sowell, Hines Ward, etc. liked their champagne. What they're taking issue with is the hip-hop subculture.

You might be thinking: "okay, okay, what's the big deal? Why is this stupid Canuck flying off the handle about this?"
Because whenever I criticize hip-hop culture (and I do) I get called 'racist." But hip-hop is not a race, it's a sub-culture. If anything I'm sub-cultureist, and I have nothing against black people as a whole.


It would seem Jay Z makes it a race issue, not a hip hop culture issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdninkorea



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
yup, at least 7 % of blacks are Republican. see here

Hmm... okay, I stand corrected on that one.
Quote:
Freeing the Confederate's slaves. Very effective.

I don't see what that has to do with it. He set millions of black people free.
The US constitution doesn't even give the President the legal power to free slaves- Lincoln could only do it as the commander in chief in enemy territory during war time (the South). Furthermore, he did it in spite of great opposition from the general population, Congress, the Supreme Court, etcetera.
If you want more information on this, here is a good article, written by one of my favourite economists (if it matters, which it shouldn't, he's black).
Quote:

You mean this:
By Party
The Original House Version:

Democratic Party: 153-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
Democratic Party: 46-22 (68%-32%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate Version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

In fact, more Democrats voted for it. Okay, so percentagewise, the Republicans got them beat. But take away the Dixiecrats and it's back in the Dems favor. Not to mention the President who pushed it through.

True, but more Democrats also voted against it. That's why I favour looking at the percentages.
I'll give you the point about the Democrat president.

But even if every Democrat voted for it, making their vote count in favour of the Act overwhelmingly greater than the Republicans, that doesn't make the Republicans a wholly anti-black party, as Worldwide suggests.
At best it puts us back with nothing but Worldwide's evocative but completely unsubstantiated claim:
Worldwide wrote:
No No, you got it wrong. George W. Bush doesn't like black people....or rather hates them.... Even better the entire republican party hates them.
(boldface mine)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satori



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know about the party, but it appears republican voters don't like black people much. There was a study done, where people had to make snap judgements about pictures they were shown, it was designed to assess instinctive rather than intellectualised racial bias. It was correlated with voting pattern. Republicans showed a strong tendency to be anti black while democrats did not...Sorry I don't have the details, so I'll be shouted down, but I do remember reading about it and it was a legit survey and rigourously carried out, passed peer review and all that...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cdninkorea wrote:
huffdaddy wrote:
Freeing the Confederate's slaves. Very effective.

I don't see what that has to do with it. He set millions of black people free.
The US constitution doesn't even give the President the legal power to free slaves- Lincoln could only do it as the commander in chief in enemy territory during war time (the South). Furthermore, he did it in spite of great opposition from the general population, Congress, the Supreme Court, etcetera.


Okay, so I was a little too glib. Lincoln's commitment to the cause got him assassinated. Still, freeing your enemies slaves isn't the be all and end all.

Quote:
True, but more Democrats also voted against it. That's why I favour looking at the percentages.
I'll give you the point about the Democrat president.


Yes, albeit that has to do with the Southern Democrats. Who were still anti-Lincoln/Republican Democrats and are only now starting to turn Republican.

Quote:

At best it puts us back with nothing but Worldwide's evocative but completely unsubstantiated claim:
Worldwide wrote:
No No, you got it wrong. George W. Bush doesn't like black people....or rather hates them.... Even better the entire republican party hates them.
(boldface mine)


An exageration, I agree. I'd say that it's not the blacks that all Republicans hate, but rather all poor people. Although, it's ironic that favoritism (aka Affirmitive Action) is now a bad thing, while favoritism (Jim Crow) in the past was okay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Zulu



Joined: 28 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benicio wrote:
And Worldwide hates all Americans.

He won't even sell his Ipod to one.


Really? Laughing

So let me get this. The Worldwide dude thinks it's ok to own an American high tech product from an American company, but not to sell it to an American?

Sir, surely you jest?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdninkorea



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
Okay, so I was a little too glib. Lincoln's commitment to the cause got him assassinated. Still, freeing your enemies slaves isn't the be all and end all.

I didn't say it was, but it's pretty good evidence that the Republican party doesn't hate black people.
Quote:
Yes, albeit that has to do with the Southern Democrats. Who were still anti-Lincoln/Republican Democrats and are only now starting to turn Republican.

Worldwide didn't make any distinction between Southern and Northern Republicans or Democrats- he made a blanket statement about the entire Republican party.
Quote:
An exageration, I agree. I'd say that it's not the blacks that all Republicans hate, but rather all poor people. Although, it's ironic that favoritism (aka Affirmitive Action) is now a bad thing, while favoritism (Jim Crow) in the past was okay.

I'm afraid I don't see the irony in this. Jim Crow laws were considered okay, but then people (some, anyway) realized they weren't and they were repealed. Affirmitive Action is the same in principle as Jim Crow (the principle being collectivism), just applied in reverse.

Anyway, at least we can agree that Worldwide exaggerated (although I wonder if he sees it that way...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cdninkorea wrote:
huffdaddy wrote:
Okay, so I was a little too glib. Lincoln's commitment to the cause got him assassinated. Still, freeing your enemies slaves isn't the be all and end all.

I didn't say it was, but it's pretty good evidence that the Republican party doesn't hate black people.


Well, you mean "didn't hate blacks". Maybe try pulling up Rice or Powell for a little more contemporary evidence.

Quote:
Quote:
Yes, albeit that has to do with the Southern Democrats. Who were still anti-Lincoln/Republican Democrats and are only now starting to turn Republican.

Worldwide didn't make any distinction between Southern and Northern Republicans or Democrats- he made a blanket statement about the entire Republican party.


Just because some Democrats hate blacks, it doesn't have anything to do with whether or not Republicans hate blacks.

Quote:
Quote:
An exageration, I agree. I'd say that it's not the blacks that all Republicans hate, but rather all poor people. Although, it's ironic that favoritism (aka Affirmitive Action) is now a bad thing, while favoritism (Jim Crow) in the past was okay.

I'm afraid I don't see the irony in this. Jim Crow laws were considered okay, but then people (some, anyway) realized they weren't and they were repealed. Affirmitive Action is the same in principle as Jim Crow (the principle being collectivism), just applied in reverse.


It's just that Jim Crow still exists, de facto, and most of the people opposed to AA like it that way.

Quote:
Anyway, at least we can agree that Worldwide exaggerated (although I wonder if he sees it that way...)


Agreed that he exaggerated. I actually know a few Republicans in Chicago. Not many, but a few.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
riley



Joined: 08 Feb 2003
Location: where creditors can find me

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sony pulled the ad.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060712/od_nm/videogames_ad_dc;_ylt=Aks8nYSuV3pZnE.pJXK8qPCs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3NW1oMDRpBHNlYwM3NTc-

What I found weird was this.
Quote:
Sony said that the Netherlands campaign intended to highlight the color contrast between the existing black PSP and the new ceramic white PSP.

Instead, the ad campaign riled California Assemblyman Leland Yee, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

Why was an American complaining about a Dutch ad? Shouldn't the Dutch decide if the Dutch ad is racist?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International