|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
death from above
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Location: in your head
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:41 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
i feel informed now...
but, wait.. itunes has spyware? arrghhh
anyway.. thanks guys  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| There's a lot of insanity going on around here, so let's try to take it one bit at a time. Full disclosure: I have an iPod and a Powerbook, though I'm far from a Mac acolyte (in fact, I'm quite irritable right now because my Powerbook has died yet again for no reason and the @*$(*@***! at Yongsan's Apple Repair Store couldn't do anything for me because the powerbook worked fine when I brought it in to him). |
Sorry to hear that. You may have better luck at the Apple centre in COEX. A lot of stores will try to discourage the returns of goods but if you're persistent enough you should get a replacement. What's funny is that there are these so called GENIUSES (yes they really call themselves that) who are as knowledgeable as a 2-bit phonecard dealer. Owners often find themselves talking to the head-honcho, which upon after a minute or 2 of intense thinking, will finally listen to you and replace your iPods/laptops free of charge.
Just make sure that you actually get something new and not a refurbish/second hand.
Apple pride themselves on quality to justify their higher prices so make them work for it.
| Quote: |
| Regarding marketing, I don't think it's as simple as saying "Well, they spend a lot on their marketing so they sell a lot of stuff." If that were the case, then their competitors would just start spending more on it and would experience similar increases in sales. The fact that they don't compete as well with the iPod has something to do with the fact that they are, generally speaking, not as good. |
Marketing sells! For things like PCs and TVs, commodities, they sell themselves so they don't need nearly as much exposure as Apple does.
Apple needs to spend big money to gain as much exposure as possible.
TV ads, posters, king-sized posters, internet ads as well as their crazed fans. This is USA style marketing - HYPE. It is far harder for a foreign company like Sony or iAudio to compete with Apple on their home ground. The same goes for Apple in Japan and Korea, I can assure you that the home grown products are way more popular.
| Quote: |
I can't tell you how many people I know from back home who decided to "not buy the hype" of the iPod and went with something from another manufacturer. Every single one of them (whether they bought from Dell, Sony, Rio or someone else) was disappointed with what they had. Either the software didn't work well or it was too small or just plain broke. Everyone I've known who has owned an iPod has had very few problems with them. Please notice that I did not say "Every single iPod made by Blessed Apple of Jobs (Hallowed is His Name) is perfect." I'm just saying that from my own personal experiences, iPods offer better features to young folk who want something quick, easy, and relatively durable that they can carry around town with them with their music (which are, of course, the primary market for these things).
|
That's fine. Every non-fanatic iPod users I know have had problems with their iPods, pbooks and macbooks. A couple of them were asked to buy another iPod because their batteries died! I have debated with some fanatics on the sound quality of the iPods, and have demonstrated right in front of them to prove it. They are livid.
People are first attracted to the advertisements, then they look at the features in big writing and they are sold. Apple does a great job of emphasising their products' benefits, they also do a great job of mocking everybody else (like their "mockery of Intel PCs"). This sort of tactic appeals to the young ones who wants individuality and snob-appeal.
| Quote: |
Which brings me to my second point. As much as some folk here have problems with "fundi Christians" (always nice when that can be brought up in a topic that has nothing to do with such people), some of the most insufferable people I've ever met are self-described "audiophiles"--"Oh, the iPod doesn't support every sound format in the world... Oh, it won't let me transfer my ultra-high-rez professional puictures... Oh, it doesn't have an integral microphone..."
|
So with your analogy, most people here would agree that Apple fans come across as the most ignorant people on the face of the planet.
Um, no. Audiophiles actually KNOW what they're talking about. You don't. With that kind of ramble I don't think I need to answer this any further.
| Quote: |
| This is true--of course, the iPod also lacks a steam iron, which is why I don't use it to iron my shirts. The iPod is designed to hold a huge amount of music for quick and easy playback on the go. Over time they've been able to advance the thing enough so that it can hold photos and videos (which I like having with me, but even without those features it would be a good buy). You can even use the thing to transmit high-quality video onto your TV. |
Transmit high-quality video to your TV? Big WHOOPEEDOO. Mobile phones do that. You are clearly missing the point and this is what all Apple zealots resort to when people talk about missing features, they start talking about missing irons and sandwich makers.
Lets talk about the good old fashion Sony walkman, the tape one. It started off as a player, evolved into a radio playing, recording portable device. It was innovative and people used it for years.
Next was the CD player, again Sony was among the first. Soon, those players had radio and even MP3s capabilities. Hell, it has evolved into a DVD playing portable. Technology has come so far, and in small packages.
You may not think or realise it, but most people appreciate the additional features. Its not about the "jack of all trade, master of nothing" bullcrap, Sony/Aiwa/Panasonic/Phllips/etc were all constantly evolving in their R&D to produce smaller, smarter portable players. Kind of like how the development of the PC helped evolved from a room size machine to a tiny handheld device.
The video iPod by the way has a sucky resolution and a poor processor for video playback. Have you actually tried watching video from the iPod on a TV? Its like watching a cam of The benchwarmers.
| Quote: |
Though the battery can be a little erratic (show me a rechargeable device that isn't), I must say I prefer it to using batteries--the last thing I want to hear after buying something like this is that I'm going to be shelling out for batteries every week or so to keep it running.
Lest you forget, the newest iPods only support USB connections--they scrapped the USB/Firewire to make room for other features. |
They scrapped the Firewire support because they wanted to cater to the larger market (ie. the PC users). Apple only has 2-3% of the IT market, too small to make enough money.
As for batteries, think of it this way. Imagine you had a remote control for your tv, video, stereo, whatever that had non-interchangeable batteries. Can you imagine buying a new remote every year just so that you could watch your TV? I don't think a lot of people can adapt to this ridiculous idea.
| Quote: |
I've yet to see another manufacturer who's been able to cram as many features and capacity into such a small case, and until I see one, I'm not going to take seriously any complaints that "The don't put enough features on it!"
|
Um, what features?
| Quote: |
As for the business end of things, I don't have the slightest idea what deal Apple made with Samsung. I am, however, aware of a little company called Western Digital (perhaps you've heard of it--they were Forbes magazine's "Best Managed Company" of 2005?). If someone else has a solid design for a portable music player, I doubt that they're going to slam their fists on the table and say "Blast! We've been outmaneuvered again by Steve Jobs!" because Samsung won't sell them HDs.
|
Oh then you should really get into it and read more about Apple's dodgy business practices.
Did you know Apple, the company, forced a lot of 3rd party sellers out of business?
Did you know that Apple almost forced Motorola (computing) out of commission when they pulled the plug on them? Apple's individuality ended right there. Apple abrutedly switched to using IBM processors. Since then Motorola has become a non-player for computers. Shame.
Did you know Apple did the same thing to IBM when they switched to Intel? It wasn't because IBM didn't have the technology or the numbers in stock. It was because Apple couldn't live up to their hype of having the fastest computers in the world. IBM now makes processors for the XBOX and possibly the PS3.
Did you know when Apple made one of the first powerbooks, their batteries were either exploding or couldn't start? This was before the iPod craze where Apple actually had TIME TO DO SOME QUALITY CHECK.
Did you know Apple recently admitted that there was a major problem with the logic board used in the Macbook pro, and that they were going to recall every one of them that had the whining problem. Oh yeah and there's that overheating problem...
Just face it, Apple skimps so much on quality control, they want consumers to do it for them. I don't think they even have an R&D department.
| Quote: |
Bottom line: the iPod has the market share it does because it makes a solid product that you don't have to think about very much. It's solidly-made, well-backed by tech support and the like, and has a very easy interface both on itself and on the computer (my extremely techno-phobic mother was amazed at how easy it is to use). I'm unaware of any other company out there that puts out a comparable product (but am more than willing to listen if anyone has a suggestion on where to find one). Until then, I'm sticking with what I have.
|
Yup, maybe if you get your overpriced, unreliable laptop...sorry notebook to work properly.
| Quote: |
P.S. I don't know what you're talking about when you say that the iPod has lower audio quality than a CD--this is the exact opposite of what I've found in my experience.
|
Then I'm sorry to say that there is something wrong with your ears or you're listening to noise. You also don't know what you're talking about when it comes to comparing sound quality.
| Quote: |
| P.P.S. In case you still suspect my ties to Apple, let me say now that I'm typing this on the PC deskop that I built some months ago--again, due to the fact that my Powerbook has inexpicably died on me. |
You are just an Apple apologist, and there is nothing wrong with that if you can admit it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eamo
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Quote:
P.S. I don't know what you're talking about when you say that the iPod has lower audio quality than a CD--this is the exact opposite of what I've found in my experience.
Then I'm sorry to say that there is something wrong with your ears or you're listening to noise. You also don't know what you're talking about when it comes to comparing sound quality. |
CG! You should know better than that!!
There is tons more information on a CD per song compared to an MP3. I think roughly about 12 times more. The CD player can get a lot more detail, depth and general quality than any MP3 player up until the MP3 track is recorded in something like 390 kilobytes per second which is very rare to see on the internet.
Anyway. Put an I-pod into a good stereo and play a song recorded at the average of 128 kbps. Then play a real CD of the song. You should hear quite a difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thunndarr
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not the absolute greatest source, but here's what CNET has to say about audio quality.
| Quote: |
James Kim,
senior editor
Ultimately, MP3 players are about the music--so which one sounds the best? Determining the best-sounding player is a tricky task since many of the top devices utilize the same sound chips. In fact, unless you have the golden ears of an audiophile, it's difficult to notice the difference between devices. Still, we, the editors and CNET Labs, put them to the test using a playlist ranging from Air to Bob Dylan, comprising a variety of genres encoded at 320Kbps VBR MP3, setting equal volume levels, and disabling any EQ or sound-effects settings. Using a pair of our trusty Grado headphones, we judged sound quality in a blind sound test and came up with some consistent (and interesting) results. Described as warm and true, the sound quality of *Cowon's iAudio X5 fared very well, as did the iRiver H320 right behind it. Toshiba's Gigabeat F20 had mixed reviews ("tinny," "good for techno" and "slightly processed with a hint of hiss") as did Creative's "tight" and "hiss-free" Zen Touch. But it was the brand-new Sony NW-HD5 that consistently ranked number one, delivering MP3s "with a crispy warm seal." Which consistently ranked last? Apple's iPod Photo. |
*I own an X5, fyi.
Anyway, as they say, sound quality is a bit subjective. However, there are some hard numbers to back some of these claims up. For one, the Ipod does not have the highest signal to noise ratio of the bunch. For another, it doesn't play a lot of formats, some of which are indistinguisable from CDs. (FLAC for example.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an ipod and I am content with it.
I bought my 20gig photo for 150,000 (display model)
I've realized that if I don't use it for a long while (three weeks+) it acts up. Otherwise, no problems.
There are a number of different Eq presets (i'd actually like a manual preset but woe, not there) which have a proFOUND affect on quality of song and I have difficulty thinking that a song can be consistently "Too ____" with such a variety of options.
| Quote: |
So with your analogy, most people here would agree that Apple fans come across as the most ignorant people on the face of the planet.
|
no... I didn't get that. Not being an "Audiophile" does not make one "the most ignorant [person] on the planet".... but that is a FANTASTICALLY apropos thing to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
CG was being outlandish about audiophiles, I thought I'd return the favour.
With regards to using EQ presets, yes they do enhance the lows, mids and highs but that doesn't make the iPod any better. They more or less hide their weaknesses.
Did you think that music were optimised when they were recorded for CD or did you think that people had to do optimise it with EQ? Just curious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zulu
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's amazing how on this board any time somebody says they prefer apple stuff they get labelled a 'cult-of-Mac' member who is simply an 'uninformed victim' of flashy marketing. Yet the 90% of computer owners who use Windows PCs are not? Bill Gates became the richest man in the world by NOT marketing to the masses? Hmmm. As somebody said the whole 'cult-of-Mac label is a pretty lame fallback. I'm into video and music production and to me, there is simply nothing as reliable as what I'm using now.
It's like this. I used Windows PCs for 15 years, lots of them. I was not exactly blissful about the constant crashes, viruses, or the lousy hardware/OS integration in general. Is Mac perfect? No, what is? But I know this - I've yet to have a single crash and I get a lot more work done. I get to use a lot of features that simply aren't on Windows machines yet. Same with the ipod. I had a little iriver thing, then I had a Yepp. They both broke, were clumsy to use, and their capacity was nowhere near enough. I went with a 'pod. I've been more than happy with it.
If being labelled a 'cult member' is the price to pay for getting stuff done and not having to go rely on Windows or Yepps anymore, well, that's how it is. But if you're going to toss labels around let's at least add Church of Latter Day Gates and Most Glorious Temple of iRiver to the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zulu
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| eamo wrote: |
| Anyway. Put an I-pod into a good stereo and play a song recorded at the average of 128 kbps. Then play a real CD of the song. You should hear quite a difference. |
Eamo, do you actually think at 128 kbps it's going to sound any better on real speakers with any other mp3 player? A 60 GB 'pod will at least allow you to rip at much higher bitrates and still hold a lot of tunes and video.
That said, I lean old school, and though it ain't very hip and happenin' to say so, still prefer vinyl or an old reel-to-reel to anything digital; CDs, Flac, VBR AAC, and even 'pods included. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zulu
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
It'd be fun to take apart most of what you said but I have to work tonight. But just one for the road, ok Rocklee?
| rocklee wrote: |
| The same goes for Apple in Japan and Korea, I can assure you that the home grown products are way more popular. |
As you know, Japanese people, like North Americans and Europeans, are pretty tech-savvy and unlike somewhere, tend to let quality rather than nationalism dictate their purchases. iPod and iTunes hold more than 50% market share in Japan http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/feb2006/gb20060223_774050.htm and Sony, the #2 there, holds a distant 16%. I've posted this stuff before but seems you're in some kind of denial. Oh well. I'll be back in Japan tomorrow and like always I'll see tons of people with ipods and stuff. Should be fun to check out the shops for all the tech that's late coming here.
But I have to admit that was one amazing rant, Rocklee! You are truly the Grand Poobah of the Cult-of-the-Anti-Mac.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheem
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zulu wrote: |
| I've posted this stuff before but seems you're in some kind of denial. |
I think it's something a bit more deep-rooted than denial. If you're feeling masochistic enough to sift through his posts, you'll notice they're just a morass of wild, shallow, and unsubstantiated assertions. I thought about crushing his arguments as well but there's a hint of zeal in them that suggests that the effort would be out the window. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005
Location: Gangnam
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheem wrote: |
| Zulu wrote: |
| I've posted this stuff before but seems you're in some kind of denial. |
I think it's something a bit more deep-rooted than denial. If you're feeling masochistic enough to sift through his posts, you'll notice they're just a morass of wild, shallow, and unsubstantiated assertions. I thought about crushing his arguments as well but there's a hint of zeal in them that suggests that the effort would be out the window. |
Same here. If I felt that energetic I could dig up thirty years of shady business practices, crappy software/hardware and the crashes and compatibility issues that plauge PC/Windows machines. Just last week Microsoft was all over the news for the spyware crap that they got busted on. But it's really not worth the effort. There's no talking to those people. They don't have to buy an iPod if they don't want to and they can't stand that anyone would. It's so outrageous that it's actually a little sad.
�S� |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
laogaiguk
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheem wrote: |
| Zulu wrote: |
| I've posted this stuff before but seems you're in some kind of denial. |
I think it's something a bit more deep-rooted than denial. If you're feeling masochistic enough to sift through his posts, you'll notice they're just a morass of wild, shallow, and unsubstantiated assertions. I thought about crushing his arguments as well but there's a hint of zeal in them that suggests that the effort would be out the window. |
I have never seen so much work put into a post as the one he did. Even the fights about religion (usually with FiveEagles or Rteacher) don't hit that, and those are pretty strong topics. The guy must really have a beef against Apple. I still don't think Ipods are that good for various reasons, but I definitely got better things to do and just won't buy one. I sure don't need to impress on people not to. fundi Mac people and fundi anti-Mac people. Oh well, spiced up this forum a bit atleast |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eamo
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zulu wrote: |
| eamo wrote: |
| Anyway. Put an I-pod into a good stereo and play a song recorded at the average of 128 kbps. Then play a real CD of the song. You should hear quite a difference. |
Eamo, do you actually think at 128 kbps it's going to sound any better on real speakers with any other mp3 player? A 60 GB 'pod will at least allow you to rip at much higher bitrates and still hold a lot of tunes and video.
That said, I lean old school, and though it ain't very hip and happenin' to say so, still prefer vinyl or an old reel-to-reel to anything digital; CDs, Flac, VBR AAC, and even 'pods included. |
Of course I didn't mean specifically i-pods sound worse up against a decent CD player. No MP3 player playing tracks at anything less than 320 kbps would match a CD player.
I love the vinyl sound too BTW. Used to have quite a good hi-fi centered around a turntable. The problem was finding the music I liked on vinyl then protecting that vinyl!! The next drunk visiting my house would always manage to scratch my new record!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005
Location: Gangnam
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is funny: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/07/14/notes071406.DTL
Not exactly relating to the iPod, but since is this the currently the only Bash-Mac thread hot right now, I thought I'd post it here.
| Quote: |
Windows Gives No Tongue
Reminder: Microsoft's bloated OS is truly terrible in the sack. But a Mac will make you moan
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Friday, July 14, 2006
It has those beady little eyes. It has that seedy come-hither stare. It has overstretched pleather pants and million-dollar gold caps over stained teeth, through which glides that famously shrill voice that seems at once tempting and full of promise and yet also more than a little whiny, deceptive, ill.
"Aww c'mon, baby," Windows pleads, kneeling at the foot of the bed. "This time it'll be different, I promise." It coughs that familiar phlegmy hack, like a busted Dell motherboard scraped over a lumpy C++ programmer.
"I'm clean as Gates' conscience! Coding smooth as PowerPoint in pudding! No hang-ups at the moment, guaranteed. Got me all the latest precautions, baby. Just downloaded 18 more urgent patches to cover up the latest in about 115,986 severe security holes and I'm triple condomed against all those bugs that sent me into such a crazy spasm last time. Check it out!"
Before you can object, Windows yanks off its startup screen and whips out some mangled kernel code so scarred and meaty and discolored it looks like something Steve Ballmer might feed to his rabid daschunds. Or vice versa.
"I'll give it to you good, baby. Send you to the moon! To the stars! To the iTunes Music Store without a single sudden inexplicable freeze!"
It is, of course, the same old story, the same old come-on, Win once again acting all smooth and charming but completely unable to avoid that world-famous sheen of BS propaganda, coupled with a smell that's a disquieting cross between wet plastic and old cardboard and roughly 10 billion collected hours of lost productivity.
"And by the way, I sure do appreciate you dumping another $49.95 for the latest in mandatory anti-virals." A chortle emits from somewhere beneath its Recycle Bin. "Damn, that stuff is like digital Viagra! My Start button is throbbing like Tom Cruise at a Scientology rave!"
You wince. Windows, as usual, ignores it.
What can you do? There you are, longtime Windows user, splayed out, exposed and ready and always, always so eager to get it on, to make something happen. You want to roll. You want to explore. You want to click and scroll and move like hot fire through 20 unique multimedia pleasures at once. You fantasize about batch processing 300 snapshots in Photoshop while downloading the latest "Family Guy" episode on BitTorrent while still carrying on three separate IM chats as your Bluetooth cell phone automatically syncs up with your calendar software. Mmm, multitasking. Makes you quiver just thinking about it.
Tingles are happening. Juices are flowing. So you do what you always do when it's just you and Windows, alone: You lie. To yourself. "Maybe, just maybe this time it really will be different," you say, blocking out the one thousand previous proofs to the contrary. "What the hell. It's not like I have much choice." You close your eyes. You give in.
You are, once again, Microsoft's bitch.
"That's it, baby," Windows coos, stroking your calves, working its way up to your hard drive. "Just relax, don't worry about a thing." Then come the magic words, the line Windows knows you secretly want to hear, the one guaranteed to send you into OS orbit: "Baby, I'll do it so good you'll think you're using a new MacBook Pro in a wireless cafe in Paris."
Oh my God. With that, you let out a huge sigh and the fantasy kicks in, allowing you to block out the fact that years of Windows seizures and viruses and malfunctions have left your nerve endings shot, your skills in the sack more sickly and atrophied than Nicole Richie at the Tanqueray factory. Not to mention how you haven't had a decent orgasm since that hot young Compaq Presario took you online at 2400K for the first time back in '88. Mmm, Mosaic.
Your breath comes in hot short gasps. Now it's not Windows at all. Now it's the long snake moan of a sleek silver MacBook running Apple's delicious OS X over your skin, caressing your belly, tickling your pelvic bones, kneading your flat panel.
Inhibitions vanish. Life opens. Your hips widen, your fingers roam, your imagination dances. This Mac, you know, will do anything you want, sacred to profane, Madonna to *beep*, with finesse and stability and zero fear of sudden viral invasion. They have mad skills down in the hot zone. Multilingual. Ambisexual. Sweet and pure on the outside and yet kinky as hell as soon as you say the word. Bonus: They don't insist on wearing old Comdex '98 baseball hats and oversized "Star Wars: Episode III" T-shirts while they get it on, like Windows. I mean, Oh my God.
Your swoon is so deep, in fact, you can ignore the fact that the thing that's actually grinding against you now is all jerky and spasmodic and jagged, traveling over your skin like a jackhammer moves over a pillow. Nothing's really inserted smoothly, random drivers all out of whack, nothing moving with anything resembling rhythm or true heat. It's just grunting, passionless tedium. It's just work.
You try not to care. You are imagining gobs of white space, graceful design, intuitive interfaces, completely sans fear of something suddenly stabbing you in the back or spying on your usage statistics or gutting your RAM. Hey, when it's a Mac you get to be fearless. Juicy. Thick with artistic possibility. Oh, this is good. You are close. Close to computing nirvana. Just a few more minutes ...
Suddenly, a sharp pain shoots up your thigh. You scream and sit bolt upright and open your eyes and sure enough, there's Windows, frozen, stuck, epileptic, its jagged yellow teeth lodged deep into your right quadriceps, Golem-like body convulsing as hunks of corrupt code fly everywhere and weird messages begin popping up all over its skin: system failures and file corruptions and strange come-ons for cheap home mortgages and online gambling and how you've already won a free iPod nano. Which is ironic. But only a little.
You sigh. All lust drains away in an instant. You feel defeated and tired and so deeply unsatisfied you might as well be Laura Bush dreaming of a hot-tub party with Colin Farrell. You reach under the bed, feel around. There it is. You grab on and yank.
The power cord pops out of the wall. Finally, Windows slumps, shuts down completely. You pry its grimy teeth from your flesh, heave its bloated body off your bed, hoping for the thousandth time that you don't have to completely re-install its entire brain while ignoring the obvious fact of its complete lack of heart. You plug it back in.
Slowly, Windows comes to. Icons pop back on, the main drive shudders once or twice, the Start button twitches, everything seems to hold steady. For now. "Hey, hot stuff!" Windows grunts, slowly registering your presence once again. "What, did I crash out again? Sorry 'bout that. Man, those viruses are a bitch!"
Then, once more, it gives you that famous overpriced, overrated, overcooked leer. "C'mon, baby, let's do it again," Windows oozes. "This time it'll be different, I promise."
|
�S� |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zulu wrote: |
It'd be fun to take apart most of what you said but I have to work tonight. But just one for the road, ok Rocklee?
| rocklee wrote: |
| The same goes for Apple in Japan and Korea, I can assure you that the home grown products are way more popular. |
As you know, Japanese people, like North Americans and Europeans, are pretty tech-savvy and unlike somewhere, tend to let quality rather than nationalism dictate their purchases. iPod and iTunes hold more than 50% market share in Japan http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/feb2006/gb20060223_774050.htm and Sony, the #2 there, holds a distant 16%. I've posted this stuff before but seems you're in some kind of denial. Oh well. I'll be back in Japan tomorrow and like always I'll see tons of people with ipods and stuff. Should be fun to check out the shops for all the tech that's late coming here.
But I have to admit that was one amazing rant, Rocklee! You are truly the Grand Poobah of the Cult-of-the-Anti-Mac. |
Having lived in Japan for 3 years, I can say that there has been an increase in iPod users, but like I said, Apple held a monopoly at one stage to stop competiting brands from buying the same HDs at the same cheap prices. Apple gained momentum but it is still nowhere near as prominent as the PSP, DS, mobile phone and PDA users in the country. Sony is still rated number one manufacturer of audio devices.
Late last year, Apple moved from top floor LAOX to a standalone building in Akihabara. Went there and saw demo model Nanos SCRATCHED TO HELL. Go to 5th and 6th floor and you'll find all the old secondhand Macs, powerbooks, LCDs and iPods. I do see unwanted Apple stuff in Hard off but it seems like they all come back to the store for some reason....
One thing about the Japanese is that they are pretty quick to jump on to the next best thing, only to throw it out the next year (you can see good quality working TVs on the side of the road to be cleared by the boogieman).
I can assure you that the single purpose MP3 player will be replaced by smarter devices such as mobile phones and multimedia players. Both Japan and Korea have already started on this with their MP3 downloadable mobile networks. If they play their cards right, people would not need to be carrying 2 or 3 devices with them anymore.
Right now, the PDA market is languishing, I see Apple trying to take advantage of that as their next so-called innovation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
