Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

9/11 Conspiracy Proof?
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:07 am    Post subject: 9/11 Conspiracy Proof? Reply with quote

Maybe I missed it somewhere. For the most part, I'm not interested in the back and forth banter between 9/11 battlers. Why? Because most 9/11 conspirators don't offer any proof of their story. e.g. where are the interviews with the guys who wired the WTCs? I doubt that there are very many people in the world who could pull such a job off. Where are they and where are their stories? Where are the witnesses who saw the buildings being wired for demolition? Having worked in a high rise office building, I don't see how that much explosive could be rigged up without anyone noticing. Where's the Deep Throat who is leaking the inside scoop? Surely someone involved would have a conscious or at least a bone to pick. In short, where is the evidence to support your chain of events? Where's your case? Trying to find holes in a once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) event doesn't qualify as proof that your theory is correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hollywoodaction



Joined: 02 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

People tend to make fanciful accusations because it provides instant gratification. For some, it justifies their personal opinions about George W. Bush ("he is/isn't the anti-christ") and the US ("we are untouchable, ipso facto, it was an inside job" or "they hate us for our freedom").

Last edited by Hollywoodaction on Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If these events had happened while Clinton was pres. don't you think there would have been a more serious investigation?

There is all kinds of proof.

Check this out for starters:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6032507852941583054&hl=en

and when you're done that one, try this one:

http://www.911weknow.com/911-mysteries-movie.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
If these events had happened while Clinton was pres. don't you think there would have been a more serious investigation?

There is all kinds of proof.

Check this out for starters:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6032507852941583054&hl=en

and when you're done that one, try this one:

http://www.911weknow.com/911-mysteries-movie.html



There is far more proof that you are a disinformation artist and a liar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So don't believe me, but watch the videos.

Are you saying that all these people are lying?

Ask structural engineer Charles Pegelow what he thinks.

http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=108

Third link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
noguri



Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Location: korea

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:33 pm    Post subject: Re: 9/11 Conspiracy Proof? Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
where are the interviews with the guys who wired the WTCs? I doubt that there are very many people in the world who could pull such a job off.


Where's the proof that there isn't a conspiracy? A document penned by one of the hijackers was found in the trunk of a rental car. Anyone could have written that. Is that proof that the hijackers really flew the planes?

Here's the conspiracy: A bunch of Saudi religious fanatics ride an airplane into a U.S. civilian target. The U.S. declares war on Iraq. Although none of the hijackers was an Iraqi.

In other words, the event is engineered in order to create a war that makes Halliburton the wealthiest company on the planet and gives increased power to Bush's regime and its backers, just short of martial law. Uh, I don't think I used the word anti-Christ. I said "increased powers just short of martial law."

Anyone can operate a drone airplane. It is operated from the ground. No wires in the building necessary.

As we know from history, the contacts between the Bush family and the Saudis were already extensive. The Bushes could easily request and receive a busload of Saudis brainwashed in Wahabi Islam, who were told they would be hijackers. The plane itself need not be piloted by the hijackers on board.

The people at Halliburton [and Cheney and Rumsfeld themselves] have declined to fess up on tape.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:56 pm    Post subject: Re: 9/11 Conspiracy Proof? Reply with quote

noguri wrote:
huffdaddy wrote:
where are the interviews with the guys who wired the WTCs? I doubt that there are very many people in the world who could pull such a job off.


Where's the proof that there isn't a conspiracy? A document penned by one of the hijackers was found in the trunk of a rental car. Anyone could have written that. Is that proof that the hijackers really flew the planes?

Here's the conspiracy: A bunch of Saudi religious fanatics ride an airplane into a U.S. civilian target. The U.S. declares war on Iraq. Although none of the hijackers was an Iraqi.

In other words, the event is engineered in order to create a war that makes Halliburton the wealthiest company on the planet and gives increased power to Bush's regime and its backers, just short of martial law. Uh, I don't think I used the word anti-Christ. I said "increased powers just short of martial law."

Anyone can operate a drone airplane. It is operated from the ground. No wires in the building necessary.

As we know from history, the contacts between the Bush family and the Saudis were already extensive. The Bushes could easily request and receive a busload of Saudis brainwashed in Wahabi Islam, who were told they would be hijackers. The plane itself need not be piloted by the hijackers on board.

The people at Halliburton [and Cheney and Rumsfeld themselves] have declined to fess up on tape.


Errr you make a lot of assumptions. You're making the "Argument from final Consequences" fallacy. 9/11 had many effects but you're arguing a handful of the effects (ie Bush has license to invade Iraq) are, in fact, the cause. 9/11 made the oil companies extremely rich. Maybe they blew up the WTC? 9/11 made everyone hate arabs. Maybe the catholic church and the jews blew up the WTC.

C'mon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
So don't believe me, but watch the videos.

Are you saying that all these people are lying?

Ask structural engineer Charles Pegelow what he thinks.

http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=108

Third link


I guess that Popular Mechanics nail in the coffin didn't sway you huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

haha!!

Not quite.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
If these events had happened while Clinton was pres. don't you think there would have been a more serious investigation?

There is all kinds of proof.

Check this out for starters:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6032507852941583054&hl=en


No proof of any foul play offered.

Quote:
and when you're done that one, try this one:

http://www.911weknow.com/911-mysteries-movie.html


Watched parts 2 and 3. No proof of any conspiracy. Just conjecture.