|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: Harsh drug laws fuel prostitution |
|
|
For those who've been following the dreadful events in Suffolk (5 women murdered in just 10 days) you may be aware that there is new discussion about how drugs can pull people into a life of prostitution, and that perhaps we should be looking at new ways of coping with drug use.
I think the government needs to seriously overhaul drug laws and spend more resources on helping people cope with their habits, if they can not successfully quit. It's unfortunate enough to be a drug addict without also finding yourself living on society's fringes as a prostitute or house burglar. Shouldn't we be finding ways of helping addicts live as normal lives as possible?
Quote: |
Deaths from dark causes
Placing blame on circumstances can verge on an evasion of human guilt. It must be remembered that official policy, on its own, was not the cause of the horrific abduction and killing this month of five women in Ipswich; the poisoned mind of whoever carried out the attacks was directly responsible. But it is already clear that two different prohibitions shaped the environment in which the women died and so must be at the centre of consideration of how other such deaths can be prevented. Prostitution and hard drug use are both at least partly outside the law and both much more common, and destructive, than society chooses to admit.
What happened in Ipswich could have happened in any town and, in less dramatic ways, does happen, quite often. Every town has its hard drug users and every town has its sex workers. It has taken the horror of the Ipswich deaths to remind people of it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,1971511,00.html |
And written by an actual drug user and prostitute:
Quote: |
This is no life for anyone
For women like me, prostitution is about a lot more than drugs, and getting out isn't easy
I've been selling sex since I was 18 and I'm 41 now. I ran away from home when I was 14 because I was terrified my mum was going to put me in care, and ended up living with fairground people for three years. Like so many girls in my situation, I drifted to London. Having no skills, I ended up working in a hostess bar, then moved down the prostitution food chain and worked for an escort agency.
By the time I was in my early 20s, I was working on the streets - and have worked there ever since. I didn'tstart using heroin straight away, but I fell in with a bad crowd and they introduced me to it. Later, when crack exploded on to the scene, I began using that too.
Crack has brought about a completely different way of working on the streets. Most of the girls I know don't use more than �20 of heroin a day, but they can use up to �200 of crack in 24-hours. Funding a heroin habit is manageable, but with crack the craving is so strong there's no limit on what you can smoke. So girls need to do a lot of punters to pay for their drugs.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1971476,00.html
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CRUSH PROHIBITION! Prohibition is by far the largest cause of crime. Worldwide, annual drug profits are in excess of 400 billion dollars. This is 80 percent of total criminal turnover.
CRUSH PROHIBITION! public safety is endangered by armed gangs fighting over turf. In western cities, 80 percent of petty crime is related to drugs.
CRUSH! KILL! DESTROY PROHIBITION! Massive amounts of tax-payers' money are wasted fighting the crime that prohibition itself creates. In the United States, 15 billion dollars are fed into the federal drug control budget annually, and the total costs of property damage, police work and incarceration are a multiple of this amount.
SMASH PROHIBITION! Prohibition causes social and personal harm on a worldwide scale. Illegality, combined with addiction and sky-high black market prices, guarantees criminality and social decay.
BURN PROHIBITION! Prohibition doesn't have any of its intended effects. Crime rates soar, the number of drug users increases, and the health problem is made worse. Mmany police commissioners now are in favour of controlled provision of heroin by the state.
FLUSH PROHIBITION DOWN THE PAN! Moral standards are declining because of prohibition. Drug use and possession places ordinary people outside the law, which may cause disrespect for the rules and moral standards society wants to set. In Western societies, 80 percent of all crime is related to prohibition. If we are really concerned about morality, we must first remove the cause of all this crime - prohibition.
GIVE PROHIBITION A MISS! The 'drug scourge' is a hoax. The actual health problem which prohibition is supposed to solve is minor in comparison to other health problems. Mind you, I do not propose banning smoking and alcohol. Banning cigarettes would quadruple their existing cost on the black market.
Prohibition? Just say no. Kick the habit.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jmbran11
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with the last guy. Drug policies drive a lot crime upwards, not just prostitution. After all, there were plenty of hookers before crack. It's easy, quick money. I mean easy because it doesn't require a degree or references, not because it wouldn't be difficult.
In the U.S. the "war on drugs" has warped an entire generation and created a whole culture of street crime and an industrial prison system. Personally, I'd rather see it decriminalized and treated. But, people have been so conditioned that drugs are evil and perpetrator should be punished, despite all evidence that we have utterly failed to even slow down the rate of drug use and all the innocent people who have been caught in the crossfire. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Come now. A murderer is targeting prostitutes, and the villain for causing all this is drugs? Nice priorities, guys. How about trying to help the women who are falling into prostitution? How about trying to make their work safer? How about trying to catch the guy, Sherlocks?
Drugs cause problems, yes. But it's ridiculous to say that jailing a dorm student with a spliff is somehow connected with stopping Jack the Ripper II. For even these cheesy tabloids it's poor journalism.
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Americans ought to know well that prohibition fails.
Legalise it, control and tax it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Come now. A murderer is targeting prostitutes, and the villain for causing all this is drugs? Nice priorities, guys. How about trying to help the women who are falling into prostitution? How about trying to make their work safer? How about trying to catch the guy, Sherlocks?
|
How about brushing up on your reading comprehension?
Quote: |
It must be remembered that official policy, on its own, was not the cause of the horrific abduction and killing this month of five women in Ipswich; the poisoned mind of whoever carried out the attacks was directly responsible. |
The OP is not about a murderer. The murder of 5 prostitutes is just the event that has focussed debate on prostitutes - and the reasons those young and attractive women became prostitutes. Sigh. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jmbran11 wrote: |
I agree with the last guy. Drug policies drive a lot crime upwards, not just prostitution. After all, there were plenty of hookers before crack. |
Where did I say that
a) Only prostitution is caused by drug policies.
and that
b) Prostitution is only caused by drug policies.
I also very much agree with the 'last guy.' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
How about brushing up on your reading comprehension? |
How about reading the headline?
Deaths from dark causes
The text of the article and the tone of the writing clearly tries to draw a connection between drugs and the murders, suggesting the two are linked as cause and effect. If this were not so, why doesn't the headline say 'dark cause' in singular and focus on the murderer? And why is the article only coming out now?
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Quote: |
How about brushing up on your reading comprehension? |
How about reading the headline?
Deaths from dark causes
The text of the article and the tone of the writing clearly tries to draw a connection between drugs and the murders, suggesting the two are linked as cause and effect. If this were not so, why doesn't the headline say 'dark cause' in singular and focus on the murderer? And why is the article only coming out now?
Ken:> |
You could argue that their deaths were partly related to their addiction to drugs and their desperate need to finance it, because that's why (it's argued) they seem to have turned to prostitution in the first place, and that's why they put themselves at daily risk of being hurt or, in this case, killed. So drugs are a very relevant contributory cause to the way they met their end.
Why is the article coming out now? Because these events have focussed the public's attention on the plight of prostitutes, and so the author sees a useful opportunity to highlight the role drugs (and the effects of drug policies) play in fuelling this unfortunate career choice, and compelling women to keep with it.
Quote: |
Come now. A murderer is targeting prostitutes, and the villain for causing all this is drugs? Nice priorities, guys. How about trying to help the women who are falling into prostitution? How about trying to make their work safer? How about trying to catch the guy, Sherlocks? |
The journalist does put the direct blame solely on the murderer. The journalist is trying to help women by highlighting the role drugs play in their decision to prostitute themselves. And it's hardly the journalist's job to catch the murderer....that's the role of the police. I can't see what your problem is really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well drugs may well have played a direct role after all:
Quote: |
Police are considering the possibility that the women may have been incapacitated before they were murdered, possibly by being drugged. One line of inquiry will be to focus on the drug dealers they regularly used. Officers confirmed that toxicology tests were being conducted.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/suffolkmurders/story/0,,1972643,00.html
|
And here we see that there is serious concern about the role drugs are playing in the prostitutes continuing to work in Ipswich, even though they are now in terrible danger. Police and drug workers are actually giving them money so that they are no longer compelled to ply their trade as usual.
Quote: |
Prostitutes in Ipswich are being given money by police and drug workers to stop them risking their lives by touting for business on the streets, it emerged yesterday.
As officers continue to hunt for a serial killer feared to have murdered five women, it was revealed that women who work in the red light area of the Suffolk town are receiving cash handouts.
Detective Chief Superintendent Stewart Gull urged prostitutes to stay off the streets, saying: "It's not safe to engage a client or punter at this time."
He would not say how much money the 30 to 40 women who work in Ipswich were being given, but added that because of the "financial support" there was "no reason to go with clients".
The money has been handed over by an unnamed charity to the multi-agency group, including police, which oversees community safety in Suffolk. Drug workers are also making sure prostitutes are receiving all the money they need. Julia Stephens, of Suffolk County Council, said the money was being used by the women to pay bills or meet loans repayments.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/suffolkmurders/story/0,,1972643,00.html
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh dear, no juicy prohibitionist conservative crap for me to rip into. I find it very hard to believe everyone in the CE forum is an antiprohibitionist.
Anyway, that the British state (the police no less) are giving prostitutes in the Ipswich area heroin substitutes and even, I've heard, money to purchase heroin on the black market (in order to deter further criminality and to promote safety) is very bad news for prohibition.
Eliminating the black market almost completely by making heroin (and other popular substances) legal - as a possible next step - seems overly optimistic however.
The reason addictive drugs will never be legalized (I'm guessing) is that public knowledge and education about drugs is very poor at kindest. Were the public to be educated as to these drugs actual potential for harm, every kid in Britain will go out and score some gear, knowing (a) they're unlikely to die (since all heroin deaths result from inattention, delay, due to fear of criminal repercussions), (b) they're definitely not going to incur any lasting harm, and (c) they're definitely not going to get immediately hooked. Drugs are anecdotally "every parent's worst nightmare". Fear of the big H, even amongst the younger generation currently in universities, is so immense that there exists deliberate unwillingness to listen to the truth, thus there will never be any pressure to legalize smack unless a government does it against public will. Fear of the Big H exists, of course, because its strict prohibition combined with addiction and black market expense, has caused sociological and health problems of immense proportions.
This is one issue - maybe there are more - where if one opposes the antiprohibitionist argument, one absolutely hasn't got a clue.
But - since the CE forum is full of staunch antiprohibitionists - I'm preaching to the converted! 
Last edited by SPINOZA on Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mnhnhyouh

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: The Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another anti-prohibitionist here. I think, however, that only the safest alternatives for up, down and sideways should be made legal. I think that amphetamines have a lot more negative side effects than cocaine, so if you legalized and regulated cocaine, there would be no need to do the same for amphetamine.
But the current prohibition is not working, and is corrupting the three powers, legislative, judicial and enforcement.
If these substances were legalized and put under government control, like alcohol, the price could be reduced to half its current level, and the profits would be orders of magnitude higher than the money currently spent on education/treatment.
Then we could get some real money into these programs, and also save lots on law enforcement....
The only way you could lose here is if the use of these substances increased in a way that was not at the expense of alcohol use.
Most police I have talked to, and those who I have heard in the media would much prefer to deal with somebody high on marijuana or herion than alcohol....
h |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent post, Mr Unpronouncable
We should also add that the USA has the worst possible combination: legal guns, illegal drugs. The reverse is the best possible combination in terms of general safety and the common good.
I too concentrate on heroin (particularly, but also.....) cocaine and the latter's derivative 'crack'.
Control of these substances should definitely be removed from the black market.
However, I'm at a loss to explain my belief that crystal meth should not be legalized. This is a weakness in my overall argument, although doesn't affect the truth of heroin needing to become legal. I just despise this substance. I've never used it and never will, but it just sounds absolutely terrible for one's health, whereas there is no evidence whatsoever that heroin (other than the possibility of untreated overdose) shortens life expectancy or is significantly detrimental to health. The latter is a revelation to most people, which is indicative of a stupidity so monstrous, given that heroin is metabolized back into its parent (morphine) when ingested and morphine is used all over the world as a painkiller (heroin too in many countries). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SPINOZA wrote: |
Prohibition is by far the largest cause of crime. Worldwide, annual drug profits are in excess of 400 billion dollars. This is 80 percent of total criminal turnover. |
Prohibition IS itself the greatest crime
Legislated by, cashed in on & fraudulently perpetuated by some of the wost kinds of criminals.
In all its various facets it does indeed rank among the world's most major immoral enterprises.
We all know the other interlocking dimensions:
WAR, BLOOD DIAMONDS, OIL RACKET, BIG PHARMA, BANKING ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't quite understand the relevance of those links, IGTG. Seemed like a buncha bible-bashin'....
Anyway....
igotthisguitar wrote: |
Prohibition IS itself the greatest crime
|
I don't go that far. Prohibition doesn't deliberately intend to inflict chaos on the world, but it does have the complete opposite of all its intended effects and to continue the state of affairs without considering the alternatives is just bonkers. Ultimately, if people want to destroy their own lives and contribute nothing whatsoever to society, I believe it'd be an awful lot more cost-effective if we just let them do it legally. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|