Which is grammatically correct?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

prescher
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 2:35 pm
Location: Sao Paulo, BRAZIL

Possession

Post by prescher » Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:13 pm

Dear All

The funny thing , in my opinion, is that most grammar books are not conclusive about this subject. I mean, they use words like: " We often/usually use the ´s ..." , " We use the ´s especially when..."
Well, this is the opinion of a non-native speaker.

Prescher

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:19 am

The genitive is one of the most confusing aspects of English grammar. If you want a thorough explanation try out "A University Grammar of English" by Leech and Spartik, et al.

However it is clear that 'of' is rarely an alternative for 's. "Joel's book" is not the same as "The Book of Joel".

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:26 am

Dear dduck,
I was replying to Preyscher not to his students. This is a teachers' forum not a students' one.

Prescher seems to be under the impression that he can teach his students to say "the car of John" instead of "John's car". THIS IS INCORRECT.

dduck
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 11:11 pm
Contact:

Post by dduck » Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:19 pm

Stephen Jones wrote:Dear dduck,
I was replying to Preyscher not to his students. This is a teachers' forum not a students' one.

Prescher seems to be under the impression that he can teach his students to say "the car of John" instead of "John's car". THIS IS INCORRECT.
Okay, so you think it's wrong. Would you like to offer a solution to prescher's problem?

Iain

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Sat Jul 12, 2003 7:13 am

Prescher knows his students better than I do. Moreover he knows the texts they are using. What he must not do is teach them an obviously wrong construction that they will not get out of their heads later on.

The different uses of 's' in English provide no end of problems. And the "morpheme studies" research carried out in the eighties suggests that you cannot reproduce certain morphemes until you have mastered others.

My advice would probably be to teach it more for recognition, and not to be too bothered by mistakes.

sita
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:59 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by sita » Sat Jul 12, 2003 11:39 am

In Germany we teach beginners:

If it is a person use the `s
If it is an object use of the

The man's car is small. John`s number is 79 79 3.

The colour of the car is red. The number of the hotel is 56666.


Siân :shock:

Harzer
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 3:17 am
Location: Australia

Post by Harzer » Sat Jul 12, 2003 1:16 pm

Or, for objects, use the noun itself as a specifier:

the garage door; the hotel number; my foot size and so on.

Harzer

sita
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:59 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by sita » Sat Jul 12, 2003 7:28 pm

yeah sure but imho the discussion was
's vs. of the

Siân :twisted:

Harzer
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 3:17 am
Location: Australia

Post by Harzer » Mon Jul 14, 2003 4:55 am

Yes, of course, but as a learner it doesn't hurt to have a fall-back position when in doubt.

Harzer

Norm Ryder
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

possessives

Post by Norm Ryder » Wed Jul 16, 2003 6:53 am

Hi all
Looks like the choice between The Bride of Frankenstein and The French Lieutenant's Woman is more difficult than you'd first think :)

On the question of the disappearing apostrophe in the UK: when I raised it earlier I thought I read it in some journalistic article on language change; but it turns out that I'd taken an article in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language a bit further than it intended.
After discussing how uncertain the use of the apostrophe had been since its introduction from the French in the 16th century, the article goes on to say that in recent times commercial practice in the UK has been increasingly to omit the possessive apostrophe from book titles and company names. What had stuck in my my mind was the phrase: "the bias is definitely towards ommission".

Later, however, the article says: there are many occasions when the ... apostrophe expresses a valuable written distinction, and there is strong pedagogical pressure on children to maintain its use, especially in the USA". Sorry, dduck, if I had you worrying nights about apostrophe being surreptitiously hijacked throughout the UK.

Keep up the discussion, folks. Every post is adding another nuance to our understanding of what we loosely call the possessive.
Norm

sita
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:59 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by sita » Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:22 am

Hi!

I preferred the J.Fowles book :-)

In Germany if you omit an ' in an exam you lose marks.

Best wishes
Siân

Norm Ryder
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

possession

Post by Norm Ryder » Sun Jul 27, 2003 7:04 am

Sian
I guess that would also be the opinion of the French lieutenant's woman.
Cheers.

Norm

Jimmytrain
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 2:48 pm

a good read in cases of angst

Post by Jimmytrain » Sat Aug 16, 2003 3:03 pm

Dear all,

I'm new to this site and find it most encoraging to see how teachers all over the world take time to help each other.

There is a great book called "Grammar for English Language Teachers" which gives a comprenhensive explanation of the subject in question. To write it here would be a long and useless task for you may want to get it for further referrence.

the ISBN is 0 521 477972

However, unless I'm very much misstaken, when " 's " belongs to the verb to be, as in "John's a mule", it is followed by the det. "a" and when it represent "possession" (john's mule) it is not. That could be a clue for your students to distinguish between them.

Hope it helped

dduck
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 11:11 pm
Contact:

Re: a good read in cases of angst

Post by dduck » Sat Aug 16, 2003 6:15 pm

Jimmytrain wrote:However, unless I'm very much misstaken, when " 's " belongs to the verb to be, as in "John's a mule", it is followed by the det. "a" and when it represent "possession" (john's mule) it is not. That could be a clue for your students to distinguish between them.
Yes, it's a start.

'John's a mule' = John is + noun

But, how about

'John's red' = John is + adjective
'John's gone red' = John has + past participle.

And then we get to

"John's red car ..."

Iain

kiwiboy_nz_99
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 7:14 am
Location: Seoul

Post by kiwiboy_nz_99 » Sat Aug 23, 2003 5:15 pm

It seems there are examples where both apply, "The house of the president" versus "The president's house". In this case I disagree that the choice is strictly a matter of formality. I think that the former emphasizes "house" and the latter emphasizes "president". Just my thoughts.

Post Reply